2024 (1) TMI 182
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Sachin Chitnis, Learned Counsel along with Shri Kiran Chava, Advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant at the outset submits that in the appellant's own case the with reference to the identical contract this Tribunal has already considered the case and it was held that the renting of Earth Moving Equipment to various clients does not fall under the category of 'supply of tangible goods for use' services on the ground that the right to possession and effective control of such equipment were transferred to the lessee and the same being a deemed sale in terms of Article 366 (29A) of Constitution of India. The transaction is of deemed sale and the appellant have admittedly paid the VAT. Therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable. He ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... relation to supply of tangible goods including machinery, equipment and appliances for use, without transferring right of possession and effective control of such machinery, equipment and appliances." While the assessee contends that what they have transferred is right to use which is a deemed sale, the Revenue's contention is that the right of possession and effective control remained with the assessee and hence, the transaction has to be treated as service. 5.2 Revenue's contention is based on the clauses in the agreement relating to restrictions of use by the lessee, provision of skilled operator by the lessor and maintenance and repairs of the equipment by the lessor. Merely because restrictions are placed on the less....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... terms and conditions stipulated in the agreement, lead to the conclusion that the transaction envisaged in the agreement is one of "transfer of right to use" which is a deemed sale under Section 2(24) of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002. The Finance Minister's speech and the budget instructions issued by the C.B.E. & C. also clarify that if VAT is payable on the transaction, then service tax levy is not attracted. 5.3 A similar issue arose for consideration before the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh in the G.S. Lamba case cited supra. The petitioners therein entered into a contract with M/s. Grasim, manufacturer of ready mix concrete (RMC) for providing transportation service for shipping RMC by hiring specially desi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....odalities and the time of the use of goods is decided by the lessee or the customer, it would be under the effective or general control over the goods; (5) the approvals, concessions, licences and permits in relation to goods would also be available to user of the goods, even if such licences or permits are in the name of transferor of the goods; and (6) during the period of contract exclusive right to use goods along with permits, licences, etc., vests with the lessee. Applying these principles and examining the terms of the contract, the Hon'ble High Court held that the transaction involved was a transfer of right to use Transit Mixers and not transport service and the petitioners had transferred the 'right to u....


TaxTMI
TaxTMI