2024 (1) TMI 178

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... and higher education cess" which was paid along with excise duty in terms of Notification No. 56/2002-CE dated 14.11.2002 as amended is admissible or not. This issue has been considered by this Tribunal in bunch of appeals and this Tribunal in the case of M/s Ind Swift Labs Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh-II vide Final Order No. A/60412-60440/2023 dated 19.09.2023 has rejected the appeal of the appellant by relying upon the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of M/s Unicorn Industries vs. Union of India reported as 2019 (370) ELT 3 (SC). It is pertinent to reproduce the relevant findings recorded by this Tribunal in the case of M/s Ind Swift Labs Ltd cited (supra) as under:- "2. The appellants are register....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....09.2003. It is pertinent to reproduce the relevant findings of the case of M/s Unicorn Industries cited (supra) which are reproduced herein below:- "39. Rule 8 of Central Excise Rules, 1944, authorises the Central Government to grant an exemption to any excisable goods from the whole or any part of duty leviable on such goods. Rule 8 is extracted hereunder : "8. Power to authorise an exemption from duty in special cases. - (1) The Central Government may from time to time, by notification in the official Gazette, exempt (subject to such conditions as may be specified in the notification) any excisable goods from the whole or any part of duty leviable on such goods. (2) The Central Board of Excise and Customs may by special order in e....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ade thereunder shall be applicable to refund, and the exemption is only a reference to the source of power to exempt the NCCD, education cess, secondary and higher education cess. A notification has to be issued for providing exemption under the said source of power. In the absence of a notification containing an exemption to such additional duties in the nature of education cess and secondary and higher education cess, they cannot be said to have been exempted. The High Court was right in relying upon the decision of three-Judge Bench of this Court in Modi Rubber Limited (supra), which has been followed by another three-Judge Bench of this Court in Rita Textiles Private Limited (supra). 41. The Circular of 2004 issued based on the interp....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....9, State of Maharashtra & Ors. v. Mana Adim Jamat Mandal, AIR 2006 SC 3446 and State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. v. Ajay Kumar Sharma & Ors., (2016) 15 SCC 289. The decision rendered in ignorance of a binding precedent and/or ignorance of a provision has been held to be per incuriam in Subhash Chandra & Ors. v. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board & Ors., (2009) 15 SCC 458, Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod v. State of Maharashtra, (2014) 9 SCC 129, and Central Board of Dawoodi Bohra Community & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors., (2005) 2 SCC 673 = 2010 (254) E.L.T. 196 (S.C.). It was held that a smaller bench could not disagree with the view taken by a Larger Bench. 43. Thus, it is clear that before the Division Bench deciding SRD Nutrients P....