TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2023 (12) TMI 1281
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ure-A) Order U/s 107(1) and R/w 107(6)(A) & (B) of CGST and SGST Acts 2017 which has been passed without jurisdiction. ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent No. 1 to admit the appeal filed by the petitioner. iii) Issue any other writ order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the present case. iv) Grant costs and interest and v). Grant such further and other reliefs as the nature and circumstances of the case may require." 2. In the captioned petition, the appellate authority while examining the maintainability of the appeal under Section 107(6) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short "CGST Act....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... others [Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2412 0f 2023] as well as the judgment rendered by the High Court of Allahabad in the case of Durga Raj Vijay Kumar .vs. State of U.P. 2022(66) GSTL.321 (All.). Referring to these judgments, he would point out that appellate authority was not justified in including other components while determining pre- deposit namely, fine, penalty and fees. He would further point out that confiscating Officer has determined tax at Rs.6,71,983/- and petitioner has already deposited 10% of the tax already determined by the Enforcement Officer. 5. Per contra, learned AGA has filed statement of objections and has contended that petitioner by questioning the pre-deposit quantum is virtually seeking to defeat the provis....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....(6) of the CGST Act outlines the conditions for filing an appeal mandating the appellant to fulfill certain financial obligations. Notably, the provision stipulates that the petitioner, in challenging a tax decision, is obliged to pre-deposit the entire amount admitted by him comprising tax, interest, fine, fee and penalty. In the context of disputing the entire tax amount, the 10% pre-deposit requirement pertains exclusively to the remaining disputed tax amount as articulated in the statutory language. Consequently, there exists a statutory basis for asserting that 10% pre-deposit obligation is confined to the contested tax quantum excluding penalty, fee and interest. This interpretation aligns with the legal principle that penalties are c....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....eparation provides insights into the lawmaker's clear intent regarding the nature and scope of the pre-deposit obligation in appeals. In legal interpretation, statutes are construed to give effect to the legislative intent. The absence of any reference to disputed interest, fine, fee, and penalty in sub-clause (b) suggests a meticulous legislative choice. If the intention were to impose a 10% pre-deposit on these consequential elements, the legislator could have explicitly included them in sub-clause (b). 10. By isolating "a sum equal to ten per cent of the remaining amount of tax in dispute" in sub-clause (b), the legislator conveys a focused pre-deposit requirement specifically related to the disputed tax amount. This implies that th....