2009 (6) TMI 82
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....None, for the Appellant. Shri Sansar Chand, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : D.N. Panda, Member (J)]. - This appeal is lying from the year 2008 with extension of stay from time to time. When the Bench had earlier heard the stay application on 18-9-08, it was of the view that the demand may be barred by limitation for which/waiver of pre-deposit was granted. It was quite probable that due to ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....293/-. Therefore, he prays that order passed by the learned Commissioner (Appeals) may be confirmed. 4.1 Heard Revenue extensively. 4.2 We examined the documents under Annexure B to the appeal folder. As per the scope of the contract, the vehicle rented was to be stationed at the premises of the hirer and such vehicle was under exclusive control of the hirer. To decide the time bar aspect, we ex....