2019 (8) TMI 1893
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....131, 19293, 19296, 19298, 19442, 19458, 19459, 19739, 19771, 19851, 19931, 19935, 19938, 20021, 20085, 20155 of 2019 THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D. AUDIKESAVALU For the Petitioner : Mr. B. Satish Sundar For the Respondent : Mr. J. Madanagopal Rao, Central Government Standing Counsel COMMON ORDER This batch of Writ Petitions have been filed by Importers challenging the notifications No. 19/2015-2020 dated 05.08.2017, No. 22/2015-2020 dated 21.08.2017, No. 06/2015-2020 dated 25.10.2017 and 04.05.2018, Nos. 04 and 05/2015-2020 dated 25.04.2018, No. 06/ 2015-2020 dated 04.05.2018 and No. 15/2015-2020 dated 02.07.2018, No. 37/2015-2020 dated 28.09.2018 read with trade notices No.19/ 2018-2019 dated 25.10.2017, No. 05/2018 dated 09.05.2018....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ned Central Government Standing Counsel relies on the following decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India:- (i) M/s. Atlas Cycle Industries Limited -vs- State of Haryana [(1979) 2 SCC 196]; (ii) Quarry Owners' Association -vs- State of Bihar [(2000) 8 SCC 655]; (iii) K.T. Plantation Private Limited -vs- State of Karnataka [(2011) 9 SCC 1]; and (iv) State of Rajasthan -vs- Mukesh Sharma (Judgment dated 22.04.2019 in Civil Appeal No. 3086 of 2016 etc., batch) It has been held in those binding decisions that the requirement of placing notifications issued in exercise of statutory power before Parliament is only optional and not mandatory and the failure to place the same before the Legislature would not vitiate the notif....