Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (12) TMI 833

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Mr. Rahul Sarda. ORDER :- 1. This petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks various reliefs, however at the time of hearing of the proceedings learned counsel for the Petitioner has prayer clause (a) of the petition which reads thus:- "(A) That Your Lordships may be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, direction or order, thereby quas....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ame to know about the proceedings from his suppliers and, therefore, such letter was addressed. The Petitioner in the said letter also requested for an adjournment of 30 days, so as to enable him to make submissions and for personal hearing. The Respondents handed over the hard-copy of the show cause notice dated 27th June 2022 to the authorised representative of the Petitioner. Thereafter, on 21s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n of Section 75(4) of the CGST Act. The Petitioner further submitted that since there is a gross violation of principles of natural justice, this Court ought to exercise its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and not relegate the Petitioner to an alternate remedy. Thus, the Petitioner has prayed for quashing of the impugned order and for a personal hearing to be granted an....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g 30 days time for making submissions and for personal hearing. The impugned order came to be passed within two weeks from the date of application for adjournment without the Respondents replying to the request for adjournment of the Petitioner. In our view, the Respondents ought to have replied to the adjournment request in writing before proceedings to pass the impugned order. The Respondents ou....