TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2023 (11) TMI 1077
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....a and a corporate office which is registered as an Input Service Distributor [ISD]. The corporate office receives services and distributes the CENVAT credit of service tax paid on such services to its two units- the domestic unit and the SEZ unit through ISD invoices as per the Service Tax Rules. 3. It is undisputed that the services provided to the SEZ unit are exempted from service tax by section 26 read with section 51 of the SEZ Act. They were also exempted through Notification No. 12/2013 dated 01.07.2013 issued under the Finance Act, 1994 [Finance Act]. In respect of those services which were received at the corporate office and the credit was distributed to the SEZ unit through ISD invoices, the SEZ unit took CENVAT credit on these ISD invoices and then filed eight applications for refund of the service tax under Notification No. 12/2013- ST dated 1.7.2013. These applications for refund are the subject matter of dispute in these twelve appeals. 4. The Assistant Commissioner rejected four of the refund claims on the ground that the applications were submitted beyond one year from the date on which the service tax was paid to the service provider and hence were time-barr....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....mount Rs. 9,88,55,966/- 8. The Commissioner (Appeals) passed Order in Appeal dated 2.9.2020 [Third impugned order] allowing the four appeals filed by the Revenue and setting aside the sanction of refunds itself which are the subject matter of the third set of four appeals. 9. Service Tax Appeals 50213/2021, 50214/2021, 50215/2021 and 50216/2021 have been filed to assail this third impugned order. The details are as follows: Order in Appeal (impugned order) IND-EXCUS-000-APP-036-039-20-21 dated 02.09.2020 Orders in Original No. 1) 10/A.C./Refund/Div-II/2019-20 dated 06.03.2020 ; 2) 12/A.C./Refund/Div-II/2019-20 dated 06.03.2020 ; 3) 09/A.C./Refund/Div-II/2018-19 dated 06.03.2020 ; 4) 11/A.C./Refund/Div-II/2019-20 dated 06.03.2020 Show Cause Notices 1) Dated 20.12.2017 2) Dated 18.05.2018 3) Dated 17.08.2017 4) Dated 11.04.2017 Period of Dispute April 2016 to June 2017 Refund amount Interest on delayed sanction of refund. 10. Thus, the Orders in Original in the second and third sets of appeals are the same although the impugned orders are different- the second impugned order was passed in the appellant's appeal for interest ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....is entitled to the refund. 11.5 Since the refunds were sanctioned beyond three months from the date of application, the appellant is entitled to interest on refunds which may be sanctioned to it. 11.6. All twelve appeals, therefore, deserve to be allowed and the refund and interest in each and every refund application needs to be sanctioned. Revenue's submissions 12. Ms. Jaya Kumari, learned authorised representative for the Revenue vehemently supported the impugned orders and submitted that they should be upheld and all twelve appeals may be dismissed. Findings 13. We have considered the arguments on both sides and perused the records. 14. The question which falls for our consideration is whether the appellant is entitled to refund of service tax paid on various input services which it had received from its corporate office through ISD invoices. The claims for refund were filed under the Service Tax exemption notification No. 12/2013-ST issued for services provided to the developers and units located in the SEZs. Four of the claims were rejected since they had been filed after one year from the date on which the service tax was paid to the service provider and....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Central Government the power to make the rules under the SEZ Act. The Special Economic Zones Rules, 2006 [SEZ Rules] have been famed under this section. Rule 31 of the SEZ Rules provides the exemption from payment of service tax on taxable services under section 65 of the Finance Act, 1994 rendered to a developer or a unit by any service provider shall be available for the authorised operations in special economic Zones. 19. Thus, the SEZ Act itself provides for exemption from payment of service tax in respect of the services provided for authorised operations to either a developer or to any unit located in the SEZ. This exemption is subject to the manner and the terms and conditions which the Central Government may prescribe. 20. The questions which arise are what is the meaning of an authorised operation and what is the meaning of 'prescribed' under the SEZ Act and what are such prescriptions and whether they have been fulfilled. According to section 2(c), "authorised operations" means operations which may be authorised under sub-section (2) of section 4 and sub-section (9) of section 15. There is no dispute in these appeals that the appellant was conducting authorised ope....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... (iv) The procedure for execution of Bond-cum-Legal Undertaking shall be as under:- (a) the Bond-cum-Legal Undertaking, where the entrepreneur or Developer is a company shall be executed by the Managing Director of the company or the Director(s) or any person who has or have been duly authorized for this purpose by a resolution of the Board of Directors of the company and shall be affixed with the common seal of the company; where the entrepreneur is a partnership firm, Bond-cum-Legal Undertaking shall be executed by all the partners or authorized partner(s); where the entrepreneur is a Hindu Undivided Family, the Bond-cum Legal Undertaking shall be executed by the Kartha; and where the entrepreneur is a proprietorship concern, the Bond-cum-Legal Undertaking shall be executed by the proprietor; (b) the value of the Bond-cum-Legal Undertaking shall be equal to the amount of effective duties leviable on import or procurement from the Domestic Tariff Area of the projected requirement of capital goods, raw materials, spares, consumables, intermediates, components, parts, packing materials for three months as applicable but which will not be levied on account of....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ring activities shall maintain separate records for trading and manufacturing activities. (3) The Unit shall submit Annual Performance Reports in the Form I, to the Development Commissioner and the Development Commissioner shall place the same before the Approval Committee for consideration. (4) The Developer shall submit Quarterly Report on import and procurement of goods from the Domestic Tariff Area, utilization of the same and the stock in hand, in Form E to the Development Commissioner and the Specified Officer and the Development Commissioner shall place the same before the Approval Committee. Rule 31. The exemption from payment of service tax on taxable services under section 65 of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994) rendered to a Developer or a Unit (including a Unit under construction) by any service provider shall be available for the authorized operations in a Special Economic Zone. 22. In these appeals there is no dispute that the operations of the appellant were authorised by the Development Commissioner under the SEZ Act nor is there any allegation that any of the conditions laid down in rules 22 and 31 were violated. 23. While the SEZ ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... (c) ********** (d) ********** (e) exemption from service tax under Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994) on taxable services provided to a Developer or Unit to carry on the authorized operations in a Special Economic Zone; (f) ********** (g) ********** (2) The Central Government may prescribe the manner in which, and the terms and conditions subject to which, the exemptions, concessions, drawback or other benefits shall be granted to the Developer or entrepreneur under sub-section (1)." 12. Section 51 of the SEZ Act further provides overriding effect to the provisions of the SEZ Act and it is reproduced below: "51. Act to have overriding effect - The provisions of this Act shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force or in any instrument having effect by virtue of any law other than this Act." 13. Section 55 of the SEZ Act gives power to the Central Government to make rules for carrying out the provisions of the Act. In exercise of the aforesaid powers, the Central Government made "The Special Economic Zones Rules, 2006 [....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....authorised operations in the Special Economic Zone; (d) ********** (e) ********** (f) ********** (g) ********** 2. ********** (emphasis supplied) 15. Proviso (c) to the aforesaid Notification dated March 3, 2009 was amended by Notification dated May 20, 2009. The amended proviso (c) is reproduced below: "(c) the exemption claimed by the developer or units of Special Economic Zone shall be provided by way of refund of service tax paid on the specified services used in relation to the authorised operations in the Special Economic Zone except for services consumed wholly within the Special Economic Zone;" 16. It would, therefore, be seen that prior to May 20, 2009 the exemption could be claimed by way of refund of service tax paid on the specified services used in relation to the authorized operations in the SEZ. However, proviso (c) was amended by Notification dated May 20, 2009. The amended proviso (c) stipulates that the exemption claimed by the developer or units of SEZ shall be provided by way of refund of service tax paid on the specified services, except for services consumed wholly within the SEZ.....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ions in a SEZ and the same was not dependent upon the conditions stipulated in the Notification issued under section 93 of the Finance Act. 20. It is in this context that the Andhra Pradesh High Court observed as follows: "22. It may be noted that sub-section (1) of section-26 begins with the words "subject to the provisions of sub-section (2)". Sub-section (2) authorizes the Central Government to prescribe the manner in which and the terms and conditions subject to which exemptions shall be granted to the developer or entrepreneur under sub-section (1). 23. As rightly pointed out by Sri S. Niranjan Reddy, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner, the word "prescribe" appearing in sub-section (2) of section 26 has to be understood with reference to the definition of the word "prescribed" appearing in section 2(w) of the SEZ Act, 2005. Section 2(w) of the Act reads as follows: "prescribed means prescribed by rules made by the Central Government under this Act." 24. Therefore, the terms and conditions subject to which the exemptions are to be granted under sub-section (1) of section 26 should be prescribed by the Rules made by t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e terms and conditions prescribed in rule 22 with the terms and conditions prescribed in the Notifications issued under any one of the five enactments listed in section 26(1) to find out whether there was any inconsistency. 34. The benefit of exemptions granted under the Notifications issued under section 93 of the Finance Act, 1994, are available to any one and not necessarily confined to a unit in a special economic zone. Section 93 of the Finance Act, in that sense is a general power of exemption available in respect of all taxable services. But, section 26(1) is a special power of exemption under a special enactment dealing with a unit in a special economic zone. Therefore, the Notifications issued under section 93 of the Finance Act, 1994 cannot be pressed into service for finding out whether a unit in a SEZ qualifies for exemption or not." (emphasis supplied) 21. Thus, what follows is that the Commissioner was not justified in examining whether the conditions set out in the Notification dated March 3, 2009 were satisfied or not for grant of any exemption from service tax. Section 26(2) of the SEZ Act does provide that the Central Government may pres....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....less of any provisions of the Finance Act, 1994. Section 26 of the SEZ Act reads as follows: 26. (1) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (2), every Developer and the entrepreneur shall be entitled to the following exemptions, drawbacks and concessions, namely: - (a) exemption from any duty of customs, under the Customs Act, 1962 or the Custom Tariff Act, 1975 or any other law for the time being in force, on goods imported into, or service provided in, a Special Economic Zone or a Unit, to carry on the authorised operations by the Developer or entrepreneur; (b) exemption from any duty of customs, under the Customs Act, 1962 or the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 or any other law for the time being in force, on goods exported from, or services provided, from a Special Economic Zone or from a Unit, to any place outside India: (c) exemption from any duty of excise, under the Central Excise Act, 1944 or the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 or any other law for the time being in force, on goods brought from Domestic Tariff Area to a Special Economic Zone or Unit, to carry on the authorised operations by the Developer or entrepreneur; ..........
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....vices was defined under section 65(105) and this list was expanded from time to time. If the taxable service was provided as a part of a works contract which involved both rendering the service and transfer or deemed transfer of goods, exemption notifications were issued by the Government towards abatement of the value of the goods used in the services. Later, on 1.6.2007, works contract service, itself was introduced as a service. The question before the Supreme Court was whether works contract service could have been taxed under various other heads prior to this date. The Supreme Court held that there was no charge on works contract service prior to 1.6.2007 because works contracts services were a separate specie of contract known to commerce and there was no levy on such contracts prior to 1.6.2007. It was pleaded on behalf of the Revenue that abatements were given through various exemption notifications prior to 1.6.2007. The Supreme Court held as follows: 43. We need only state that in view of our finding that the said Finance Act lays down no charge or machinery to levy and assess service tax on indivisible composite works contracts, such argument must fail. This is ....