Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2007 (12) TMI 217

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench H, New Delhi ("the Tribunal") in I. T. A. No. 3187/Del/2003 relevant for the assessment year 1998-99. According to learned counsel for the Revenue, the tax effect in this case on a notional basis is about Rs. 47.65 lakhs, although she does not deny that the assessee has been assessed at a loss. According to learned counsel for the Revenue, deletion of additions mad....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ns three different accounts-two under the head "Sundry Creditors account" for FBD and Pump Division and one unsecured loan account. 3. According to the assessee, the difference arose on account of the fact that the amount was debited by M/s Polar Industries Ltd. but a corresponding entry was not made by the assessee. 4. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) was of the view that even if the as....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed by any perversity. We do not find that any substantial question of law arises out of this finding. 5. The second issue urged by learned counsel for the Revenue is with regard to the addition of Rs. 81.68 lakhs being the difference between reduction in value of stock and the sale price. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) was of the view that the valuation of stock had been carried out by ....