2023 (11) TMI 39
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ding Counsel and Ms Deeksha Gupta, Adv. For the Respondent Through: Ms Kavita Jha with Mr Himanshu Aggarwal, Advs. RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. (ORAL): 1. This appeal concerns Assessment Year (AY) 2011-12. 2. Via the instant appeal, the appellant/revenue seeks to assail the order dated 30.04.2020 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [in short, "Tribunal"]. 3. Mr Ruchir Bhatia, learned senior sta....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d by us today in an appeal concerning the respondent/assessee in ITA No. 329/2023. The relevant observations made therein read as follows: "...3. The sole ground on which the impugned order is sought to be assailed before us is that the deduction qua bad debts acquired by the respondent/assessee from its predecessor-in-interest, i.e., Eicher Motors Ltd. [EML], on acquisition of its commercial ve....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....der dated 20.11.2015 has ruled in favour of the respondent/assessee. 6.1 This view has been sustained by the Tribunal. 7. According to us, this issue is no longer res integra, given the factual matrix arising in the instant matter and in view of the judgment rendered by the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax v. T. Veerabhadra Rao, (1985) 155 ITR 152 (SC). 7.1 This view has also foun....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....revenue expenditure. 5.1 This view was taken based on the conclusion that the training expenses incurred by the respondent/assessee were expenses which resulted in skill development of the technicians. 5.2 Consequently, the AO allowed as deduction only a part of the expense amounting to Rs. 1,15,22,490/- in the AY in issue, i.e., 2011-12. The remaining amount, i.e., Rs. 2,30,44,980/- was disallo....
TaxTMI
TaxTMI