Upgrade to AI Tools ✕

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
     - Overview Summary
     - Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     - Relevant Case Laws
     - Tariff / Classification / HSN
     - Expert views from TaxTMI
     - Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

TMI Blog

Home /

Previous Next

Court Finds No Evidence of Illegal Importation Involvement Under Customs Act Sections 112 and 114; Penalties Challenged.

X X X X Extracts X X X X

Full Text of the Document

X X X X Extracts X X X X

....Levy of penalty u/s 112 & 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 - allegation of abating the importer - In present import, there is no evidence to allege that appellants were actively involved in illegal import of goods by communicating with overseas agencies or by transferring any amount though illegal channel. Merely if the documents pertaining to the import is handed over through the appellants to clearing agent, no conclusion can be drawn that appellants are involved in illegal import. - AT....

Previous Next

Contact Us At :

FAQs :

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Court Finds No Evidence of Illegal Importation Involvement Under Customs Act Sections 112 and 114; Penalties Challenged.