Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (10) TMI 1194

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....2.2019 for the Assessment Year (A.Y.)2018-19. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee, CEO of M/s Yugandhar Housing Private Limited, had filed his return of income on 30.08.2018 by admitting total income of Rs. 11,26,240/-. A search & seizure operation u/s 132 of the Act was conducted in the business premises of M/s Yugandhar Housing Private Limited & Group on 25.10.2017, in which the case of the assessee was also covered and cash of Rs. 3,00,000/- was found and seized from the residential premises of the assessee. Thereafter, during the assessment proceedings, notices u/s 143(2) and 142(1) of the Act were issued and served on the assessee. The assessee had furnished details / information called for in the notices. During the co....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....es from agricultural income of assessee's father i.e. Rs. 1,00,000/- (50% of Rs. 2,00,000/-) and confirmed the remaining amount of Rs. 1,00,000/- for want of sufficient evidences. 4. Aggrieved by the order of the Ld.CIT(A), the assessee preferred an appeal before the Tribunal by raising the following grounds of appeal : 1. The learned CIT(Appeals) is erred in facts and law while passing the order. 2. The learned CIT(Appeals) is not justified in giving relief to the extent of 50% of claimed sources from Agricultural income of the father J.Veera Reddy, i.e. Rs. 1,00,000/- and sustaining the balance addition of Rs. 1,00,000/- without any reason. 3. The learned CIT(Appeals) is not justified in confiring the part ad....