2023 (8) TMI 1368
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....) FOR THE PETITIONER(S) NO. 1 ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1. Revenue is in appeal against the judgment of the Incometax Appellate Tribunal dated 16.11.2017. Following questions are presented for our consideration. "(A) Whether the Appellate Tribunal was justified in restricting the disallowance of Rs.1,28,00,000/under Section 14A of the Act to the extent of R....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ellate Tribunal has failed to consider that the assessee is not a banking entity where bill discounting can be accepted to be trading receipt and the resultant debt be treated as bad trading debt ? (G) Whether the Appellate Tribunal has erred in deleting the disallowance u/s.36(1)(iii) made by the AO inspite of the fact that the assessee could neither prove the nexus between the interest ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....arning tax free income. Disallowance of Rs.2.40 lacs was made for administrative expenses. This issue, we have already examined in assessee's Tax Appeals No.1022 and 1023 of 2018. No separate discussion is necessary. 3. Questions No.(C), (D), (E) and (F) pertain to the Revenue's objection to the assessee's claim of bad debt under Section 36(1)(viii) of the Incometax Act, 1961. The Tribunal exam....
TaxTMI