Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2009 (8) TMI 38

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....GMENT ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. (Oral) - The revenue has preferred this appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, "the Act") against the order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench dated 30.06.2008 passed in ITA No. 360/Chandi/2007 for the assessment year 2003-04, proposing to raise following substantial question of law:- "Whether on the facts and circumstan....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Officer rejected the claim holding that the assessee being an Institution was governed by Section 11 (1) (d) read with Section 12 (1) of the Act. It was held that exemption under Section 11 (1)(a) was applicable only to Trust. On appeal, the CIT(A) upheld the claim of the assessee, which order has been affirmed by the Tribunal. 4. The Tribunal observed:- "In this case the Assessing Officer h....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he ground that it was not a Trust but a society/institution." 5. It was further observed that the Assessing Officer was required to verify the claim that expenditure had been factually incurred. 6. We have heard learned counsel for the revenue. 7. Contention raised on behalf of the appellant is that the Assessing Officer was justified in declining exemption as there was distinction in a T....