2009 (8) TMI 24
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... 280 of 2007 Sri Chetan Joshi, learned counsel for the appellant. Sri Arvind Vashist, learned Standing Counsel for the Income Tax/respondent. JUDGMENT Since all these 13 appeals, preferred under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short the Act) are directed against the order dated 8-6-2007 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Delhi Bench 'C') (for short ITAT), in IT....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....peals:- 1. Whether the tax paid by the employer/assessee on the salary paid by it to its employees, is exempted under Section 10(10CC) of the Income Tax Act, 1961? 2. Whether, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has erred in law in holding that the income tax is payable by the appellant/assessee, under the principle of multi stage grossing up? 5. Relevant facts of the case are that assessee....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... assessees preferred the appeals before the ITAT, which were dismissed by the order impugned in these appeals. 6. At the outset, learned counsel for the assessees/appellant has submitted that the Division Bench of this Court by its order dated 24-7-2009 has already set aside the impugned order dated 8-6-2007 passed by the ITAT New Delhi Bench 'C' in ITA Nos. 3120 to 3195/Del/2006 (Assessment Ye....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ed counsel appearing on behalf of the revenue/Income Tax, Sri Arvind Vashist, has fairly conceded to the above fact. 8. Since the order impugned stood already set aside and the matter has been remanded to the ITAT for reconsideration, all these 13 appeals are liable to be disposed of in terms of order dated 24-7-2009 passed in Income Tax Appeal No. 206 of 2007 Western Geco International Ltd. Vs....
TaxTMI