Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (10) TMI 925

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ocate   For the Respondents / State : Mrs. K.S. Joshi, Addl. G.P.   ORAL JUDGMENT : (PC) Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with the consent of learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petition questions the action on the part of the respondent No. 3 in blocking the Electronic Credit Ledger of the petitioner. On 14/09/2022, after hearing the learned counsel for the p....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s Court in the case of Dee Vee Projects Ltd. Vs. Government of Maharashtra and ors. reported in 2022(2) Bom. C.R. 239 have also not been fulfilled in the present case, at least as seen from the impugned communication. He further submits that now, illegal notices of recovery are also being issued by the respondents. 3. The points raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner require considera....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d Services Tax Rules, 2017, indicates that such a blocking can be done by the Commissioner or an officer authorized by him in this behalf, not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner. Admittedly, the respondent No. 3 does not fall within that category and is an Officer of the rank below that of the Assistant Commissioner. Though the Notification dated 24/1/2020 has been relied upon to contend tha....