Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (11) TMI 1802

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 2. That the Ld. CIT. prejudicially disallowed salary of Rs 7,20,000/- u/s 40A(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act,1961. 3. That the Ld. CIT was not justified while disallowing interest of C.L.Mehra & Sons HUF, Mr. C.L.Mehra, Chand '"Mehra and Vinay Mehra u/s 37 read with sec 40A(2)(b) 4. That the Ld CIT unfairly applied the provisions of Section 14A of the I.T. Act 1961 and added sum of Rs. 26,21,773/- while the same section was not applicable. He also overruled the Hohab'le Delhi High Court Judgment for which Ld. CIT was bound to comply and obey. 5. That That the assessee reserves the right to add, delete , alter and modify to the above grounds of appeal. 2. Briefly stated facts of the case at that the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of Sh. C. L. Mehra (Rs. 3,60,000/-), Lata Rani Mehra ( Rs. 3,60,000/-), Namita Mehra (Rs. 3,60,000/-) totalling Rs. 7, 20,000/-and deleted the disallowance in respect of the balance persons. 4.2 Before us, the Ld. counsel of the assessee fairly accepted that in preceding assessment year 2011-12, the Tribunal has upheld the disallowance under section 40A(2)(b) of the Act, however, he submitted that in view of the experience of the persons in the industry and services rendered, the expenses might be allowed in the hands of the assessee. 4.3 The ld. DR, on the other hand, relied on the order of the lower authorities. 4.4 We have heard the rival submission and perused the relevant material on record. The Assessing Officer made disallow....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d and the ground No. 2 of the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. 5. The ground No. 3 of the appeal relates to disallowance of interest to M/s. CL Mehra & sons (HUF), Mr C L Mehra, Mr. Chand Mehra and Mr. Vinay Mehra u/s 37 read with section 40A(2)(b) of the Act. 5.1 We have heard rival submission of the parties on the issue in dispute. The Ld. counsel of the assessee reiterated the arguments which were made before the lower authorities, particularly in relation to the trademark of "Mehrasons" owned by Sh. CL Mehra. The learned CIT(A) following the finding of his predecessor in assessment year 2011-12 sustained the disallowance of interest in respect of Sh. CL Mehra, M/s. Mehra and Sons HUF, Mr. Chand Mehra and Mr. Vinay Mehra. The T....