Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2009 (4) TMI 119

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... certified on 23.4.2009 in Appeal No. ST/70/2009) Shri Vipul B. Khandhar, Consultant for Appellant Dr. Manoj Kumar Rajak, SDR for Respondent Per B.S.V. Murthy: Appellants are engaged in providing construction services. It was noticed that the appellants had availed cenvat credit under Cenvat Credit Rules 2004 to the tune of Rs.74,888/- in the quarter ending March 2006 and simultaneousl....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... submits that it is the taxable event which is relevant and in this case the services were rendered during January and February, 2006 and only payment was received in March, 2006. Since the taxable event occurred during the period prior to issue of Notification No. 01/2006-ST dated 01.3.2006 and during the period of rendering taxable service, they have received input/input services and at that tim....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cation No. in existence was 01/2006-ST dated 01.3.2006 and therefore, the service tax should have been paid on the basis of that Notification only Therefore, the stand taken by the Revenue is correct. 4. I have considered the submissions made by both the sides. There is no dispute that the service was provided prior to amendment arid by the time payment was received and tax liability arose, the....