Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (10) TMI 701

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Udaipur,[in brevity 'the AO'] order passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act. 2. The assessee has taken the following ground: "1. 1.1 AND 1.2 : The impugned order u/s 148/143(3) dated 20.06.2018, as well as the action taken u/s 147/148 and notices are bad in law, illegal, invalid, void-ab-initio on facts of the case, for want of jurisdiction, without proper approval and satisfaction of higher authorities u/s 151 of the Act, and also barred by limitation and various other reasons and hence the same may kindly be quashed. 2 Ground 2. Rs. 15, 53,1 12,'-: The Id. CIT(A) has grossly erred in law as well as on the facts of the case in sustaining the addition of Rs. 15, 53,1 12/- made by the Id. AO on account of capital gai....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s non functional, so, it cannot be accepted as a nature of agricultural land. Hence, the entire claim of deduction u/s 54B was duly rejected and the order of the ld. AO was upheld. Being aggrieved assessee filed an appeal before us. 4. The ld. AR for the assessee vehemently argued and filed written submissions which are kept in the record. The ld. AR placed that the assessee had purchased and sold the land which both are agricultural in nature, there is no dispute that the said land is not an agricultural land. The ld. AR invited our attention in the appeal order pages 28 to 29 which are reproduced as below: "In the course of the present proceedings, I find that the Appellant has reiterated the same facts as was submitted before....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... when the court either believes it to exist or considers its existence so probable that a prudent man ought, under the circumstances of the particular case, to act upon the supposition that it exists. The belief regarding the existence of a fact is thus to be founded on a balance of probabilities. A prudent man faced with conflicting probabilities concerning a fact-situation will act on the supposition that the fact exists, if on weighing the various probabilities he finds that the preponderance is in favour of the existence of the particular fact as a prudent man. So the Court applies this test for finding whether a fact in issue can be said to be proved. The first step in this process is to fix the probabilities, the second to weigh them,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....relevance to the issue on hand. The ground is, thus, dismissed. 5.3. As regards ground 3, since the Appellant has not added, altered or amended any of the grounds, the same is dismissed as not pressed. 6. In the result, the appeal is dismissed." 5. The ld. DR vehemently argued and fully relied on the order of the revenue authorities. 6. We heard the rival submission and consider the documents available in the record. The ld. AR primarily claimed that the assessee submitted the relevant documents before the revenue authorities thereafter same was submitted before the ITAT. The sale deed of agricultural land in APB pages 14 to 20, copy of purchase deed of new agricultural land in APB pages 21 to 29, copy of the affidav....