2023 (10) TMI 582

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... By means of present petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 20.11.2020 / 7.12.2020 and 21.1.2021 passed by respondent no. 3 and 5 respectively and the order dated 17.11.2021 passed by respondent no. 2. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a proprietorship firm having G.S.T.I.N. No. 09CCBPS0675N1Z0, engaged in retail whole sale business and deposited all due tax liabilities within time without any default. He submits that on 9.11.2020, a survey was conducted on the business premises of the petitioner and thereafter notice under Section 29(2) of UPGST Act was issued against the petitioner asking him to appear on 27.11.2020; the petitioner moved an adjournment application but without considering....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... learned counsel for the parties, the Court has perused the records. 8. Admittedly, the order of cancellation has been passed without assigning any reason and revocation application has also been rejected without assigning any cogent reason and thereafter appeal has also been dismissed by the impugned order. The GST registration can only be cancelled as per Section 29 of UP GST Act. 9. From the perusal of the impugned order, it transpires that the same has been passed without recording any cogent reason for cancelling the GST registration of the petitioner and appellate authority has also dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner summarily without assigning any reason. 10. Reason is the heart beat of every conclusion. In the absence o....