Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (10) TMI 458

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r (Appeals) under section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). 4. Briefly the facts are, the assessee is a non-resident corporate entity incorporated in France and a tax resident of that country. As stated, assessee owns certain right, know-how, designs, and processes required to design, build and implement integrated aluminium production plants. The assessee is also a leader in primary metals and their by-products and also provides a variety of technical and related services that include quality control, the design of machines, equipment and production processes, supervision and advice on industrial installations, along with their commissioning and operations, mainly in the field of aluminium and associated installations. For the assessment year under dispute, the assessee filed its return of income on 23.03.2012 declaring income of Rs. 113,44,74,298/-. The assessee claimed the income declared to be in the nature of Royalty/Fee for Technical Services (FTS) under Article 13 of India - France Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). In course of assessment proceeding, the assessee came up with fresh claim that the income declared in the retur....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d the amount as income by treating it as FTS. He submitted, the disputed amount was received from HIL in connection with certain services relating to their plant in Orissa. The break-up of such service is as under: Nature of Services (1) -* Installations or Structures in connection with services rendered (2) Eligible Exclusion under Article 12(5)(f) &(g) (3) Hindalco paid for technical documentation in the form of an Engineering Package made, based on an agreed Basic Site Data List that included flow sheets, specifications, drawings, layouts, and operating procedures to implement Aditya Smelter in Odisha to produce Aluminium. Aditya Aluminium Smelter at Lapanga, DDisistttt.. Sambalpur , Odisha paid under clause 4.2. (c) & (d); 4.19.2 (g) & (h), read with Articles 3.2; 3.3; 4.19; 4.19.2; & Schedule 3.2 of the TLA. Rs.10,35,94,783 For getting Main Drawings to enable Hindalco to Study and comment on the Solios Proposal i.e., Process specifications, equipment lists for Paste Plant and Anode Recycling Shops of Green Anode based on RHODAX Technology. Aditya Smelter at Lapanga, Distt. Sambalpur Odisha under Purchase Order No. 8183 dated 22/01/2009 Rs. 49,42,601 ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... mines; (ii) refining of bauxite in a refinery to produce alumina, a white powder, and (iii) smelting of alumina in a smelter to produce ingots, an usable raw material for the industry. 8. He submitted, learned first appellate authority has erroneously concluded that the amounts received by the assessee towards basic site data list, including flow sheets, specifications, drawings, layouts, and operating procedures under TLA as FTS falling under Article 12(4)(a) of India - Portugal DTAA. He submitted, the observations of the first appellate authority that the services provided have no connection with the tangible plant, is completely wrong. He submitted, without the aid of such services, the service recipient could not have erected the plant or expanded their capacities. He submitted, the services provided were highly site-centric, tailor-made, and were delivered in the form of deliverables like drawings, layouts, manuals, on-site supervision, flow-charts etc., which cannot be termed as intangible service or property. He submitted, the services are neither ancillary nor subsidiary to the application or enjoyment of the right, property or information for which the assessee had rec....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ere received by the assessee under two separate purchase orders: Nature of Services (1) Installations or Structures in connection with services rendered (2) Eligible Exclusion under Article 12(5)(f) &(g) (3) For getting Main Drawings to enable Hindalco to Study and comment on the Solios Proposal i.e., Process specifications, equipment lists for Paste Plant and Anode Recycling Shops of Green Anode based on RHODAX Technology. Aditya Smelter at Lapanga, Distt. Sambalpur Odisha under Purchase Order No. 8183 dated 22/01/2009 X49,42,601 For getting Paste Plant Layout Drawings & Process operation manual; material proportionating specification and material balance; assembly drawings electrical & automation specifications for anode recycling shop; and process specificat ions & flow diagram along with equipment list for the fines handling based on RHODAX Technology for installing Hindalco 35 TPH capacity Green Anode plant. 35 TPH capacity Green Anode plant of Hindalco at Mahan Smelter Singrauli (M.P.) under Purchase Order No. 9150 dated 24/09/2009 ,12,62,600 TOTAL 1,62,05,201/- 11. Firstly, there is a factual error in the observations of learned Commission....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e aid and assistance of the assessee. He submitted, the job of getting site and project-specific drawings/layouts/plans/designs cannot be termed as FTS. In support of such contention, he relied upon the following decisions: i. CIT Vs. De Beers India Minerals Ltd. (2012) 346 ITR 467 (Kar.) ii. Raymond Vs. Dy.CIT (2003) 86 ITD 791 (Mumbai) iii. DCIT Vs. ITC Ltd. (2002) 82 ITD 239 (ITAT-Kol) iv. DIT Vs. Guy Carpenter & Co. Ltd. (2012) 346 ITR 504 (Del.) v. Intertek Testing Services India Pvt. Ltd. (2008) 307 ITR 418 AAR vi. Steria (India) Ltd. Vs. CIT (2016) 72 taxmann.com 1 (Del) 12. He submitted, Article 12(4)(b) presupposes an 'application of technology' (commercial use) as an owner, not for the limited use of a service/technology. Therefore, unless the technology is made available to the service recipient, which can be applied by him as an owner for commercial use, it cannot be said that the assessee has made available technology, knowledge, skill etc. to satisfy the condition of Article 12(4)(b) of the tax treaty. Thus, he submitted, the receipts cannot be treated as FTS under Article 13 read with paragraph 7 of Protocol to....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....unsel for the assessee has accepted the position that the receipts of Rs. 10,35,94,783/- received from HIL under the TLA and Rs. 3,96,34,166/- received from Nalco would qualify as FTS under Article 12(4)(a) of India - Portugal DTAA. However, it is the claim of the assessee that the aforesaid two amounts would not qualify as FTS due to exceptions provided under Article 12(5)(f) and 12(5)(g) of India - Portugal DTAA. Obviously, learned Commissioner (Appeals) has rejected the aforesaid claim of the assessee by observing that the services rendered by the assessee are in respect of intangible in the form of technology process/solution, which has no connection with the installation or structure, which is tangible in nature. He has observed that the function of installation of HIL and Nalco plant is not within the scope of work given to the assessee. He has further observed that the production of alumina involves three stages from mining of bauxite, at the first stage, to the process of smelting, which is the third stage. He observed that the technology solution provided by the assessee is for the process of smelting and not related to the mining of bauxite. According to learned Commissio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....her facts and materials on record, it is observed that the amount of Rs. 10,35,94,783/- was received by the assessee for providing basic site data lists, which included flow sheets, specifications, drawings, layouts, operating manuals, procedures to build/construct/install/assemble these smelter plants. It is not a simple case of loading a technology solution/software as observed by learned Commissioner (Appeals). The smelter plant certainly requires installation of multiple plants and machineries. It involves on-site planning and supervision of erection and installation of not only civil work but also the plant and machinery. There cannot be any dispute that the installation/erection process has to be taken up as per the flowsheets, equipments, specifications, drawings, layouts, operating manuals, procedures etc., without which, the installation process cannot be carried out. Therefore, in our view, the service rendered by the assessee is in connection with installation/erection of plant and machinery involved in mining of natural resources. Moreover, scope of Article 5(2)(g) of India - Portugal DTAA is not merely limited to mining or extraction of natural resources but also cover....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....der Article 12(4)(b) of India - Portugal DTAA. 22. Insofar as on-site man-day fee of Rs. 1,39,90,735/- is concerned, though, it is in pursuance to TLA and may qualify for FTS under Article 12(4)(a), however, in our view, the receipts fall within the exceptions provided under Article 12(5)(f) and 12(5)(g) of India - Portugal DTAA, hence, would not qualify as FTS. Thus, we hold that the receipts in dispute are not taxable as FTS at the hands of the assessee. Grounds are allowed. 23. In the result, the appeal is allowed. ITA No. 3410/Del/2016 AY: 2010-11 24. In view of our decision in ITA No. 9483/Del/2019 for assessment year 2010-11, this appeal has become infructuous, hence, dismissed. 25. In the result, appeal is dismissed. ITA No. 9484/Del/2019 AY: 2011-12 26. In course of hearing, both the parties have agreed before us that the facts and issues involved in the present appeal are identical to the facts and issues involved in ITA No.9483/Del/2019. 27. Additionally, learned counsel appearing for the assessee submitted that the present appeal factually stands on a slightly different footing as the Technical Collaboration Agreement (TCA) has expired on....