2015 (7) TMI 1431

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Respondent : Shri Patil Vijay Y. ORAL JUDGMENT :- 1. Heard the learned Advocates at length. 2. Rule. 3. By consent, Rule is made returnable forthwith and the petition is taken up for final disposal. 4. The respondent / employee retired on 18.3.2005 on superannuation. The impugned judgment and award of the Labour Court in Reference (IDA) No.47 of 2007 is dated 20.6.2013. 5. T....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ich was the date of attaining superannuation. 8. The petitioner indicates that the past record of the respondent is highly blemished. He was earlier dismissed from service on two occasions for similar misconducts committed on 30.9.1979 and 12.2.1986. 9. He submits that the Labour Court has decided all the issues in one stroke thereby concluding that the findings of the enquiry officer are pe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....his Court and followed in the case of Maharashtra State Roadways Transport Corporation, Beed Vs. Syed Saheblal Syed Nijam [2014 III CLR 547], has not been followed by the Labour Court. It could not have decided the preliminary issues along with all the rest of the issues in one stroke while delivering the impugned award. For this reason alone, the impugned award is rendered unsustainable 13. Ho....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e is as to whether the matter can be remitted back to the Labour Court for fresh a decision by following the procedure laid down in law. For the said purpose, the respondent who is about 70 years today, will have to prosecute his reference proceeding. Under fortuitous circumstances, the findings of the enquiry officer have been held to be perverse by the Labour Court, thereby setting aside the enq....