Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (10) TMI 336

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....7/-, after adjusting a sum of Rs. 9,25,366/- as interest due from the petitioner on the amount utilized by the petitioner. 3. The specific case of the petitioner is that the petitioner could have asked for refund of the amount that was lying unutilized in the Personal Ledger Account under the provisions of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as on 30.06.2017. 4. However, by mistake, the petitioner transitioned the amount lying in its Personal Ledger Account on 23.08.2017 as if it were an Input Tax lying unutilized, in accordance with Section 140 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. 5. The further case of the petitioner is that the petitioner had a substantial balance in its Integrated Goods & Services Input Tax Credit Account....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... be paid at such rate not exceeding 24%. It is submitted that the GST Acts contemplates to match the Input Tax credit availed by the recipient with the details of outward supply of supplier and the same have been explained in Sections 42 and 43 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. 10. It is further submitted that those tax payers who migrated from VAT and or Central Excise Act, 1944, or Finance Act, 1994 were entitled to carry forward the legacy credit under Section 140 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. It is submitted that the petitioner had an option to carry forward legacy credit in its Electronic credit ledger by filing TRAN-1. In the present case, the petitioner had carried forward the legacy credit along ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ction (2) of section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944: Provided that where any claim for refund of CENVAT credit is fully or partially rejected, the amount so rejected shall lapse: Provided further that no refund shall be allowed of any amount of CENVAT credit where the balance of the said amount as on the appointed day has been carried forward under this Act." 14. The fact also remains that the petitioner had sufficient balance of Input Tax credit availed on Integrated Tax as borne by the petitioner on the supplies made to the petitioner as per Section 49(5)(B) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The aforesaid amount has to be first utilized towards the Integrated Tax liability and thereafter t....