Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (10) TMI 1573

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....a has erred in law and facts in upholding the contention of the learned A.O. in adding Rs. 44,57,98,668/- under section 35AD of the Income Tax Act, 1961 inspite of complete documents alongwith reason and not rebutting the deduction except stating that no plausible explanation submitted. 2. That the appellant reserves the right to add, amend or delete one or more of the grounds of appeal before the appeal is disposed off. 3. The only grievance of the assessee in this appeal relates to the sustenance of addition of Rs. 44,57,98,668/- made by the A.O. under section 35AD of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act'). During the course of hearing the Ld. Counsel for the Assessee at the very outset stated that the iss....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....though the assessee had taken up the construction of warehousing facility during the year which is covered under the specified business, however, in view of the proviso to Section 35AD, the deduction was available to the assessee whose date of commencement of business is on or after 01.04.2009 and since in this case the assessee has existing business of warehousing and hence, it cannot be said that the assessee had commenced the business of warehousing during the year under consideration. He, therefore, disallowed the deduction claimed by the assessee u/s 35AD of the Act. The ld. CIT(A) upheld the above finding of the AO. 11. We have heard the rival contentions. To better understand the case, we deem it fit to first reproduce the p....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....es operations of his specified business. 13. In our view, the lower authorities have wrongly interpreted the relevant provisions of the Act. There are two parts of the abovesaid provisions. In the first part, it has been mentioned that an assessee is eligible to claim deduction of the capital expenditure if such an expenditure has been incurred wholly and exclusively in a specified business. There is no condition of any date or year of commencement of specified business. However, in the second part, it has been provided that if such an expenditure has been incurred prior to the commencement of business and has been duly capitalized in the books of account, the claim will be allowed in the year in which the assessee commences operat....