2023 (10) TMI 227

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... S. Mandal & R. Chaudhuri, all Advocates for the Appellant Mr. Joydip Choudhury, Authorized Representative for the Respondent ORDER PER R. MURALIDHAR The Appellant is providing the service of Testing, Inspection and Certification Services. During the period October 2005 to September 2010, they have been providing the service for the goods which were to be exported from India to other ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er by way of internet transmission and by way of courier it will still make it a service which has been partly performed outside India to get the benefit of the services being treated as export of services. He cites the case law of SGS India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai-2011(24) S. T. R. 60 (Tri.- Mumbai), wherein on identical issue, the Tribunal relying on the case law of B. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the period under dispute, the Appeal is covered by the cited case law. Therefore, in such a situation, the question of suppression on their part could not arise. Hence, he submits that the demand for the extended period is liable to be set aside on account of limitation. 3. The Learned AR draws our attention to amendment made to Rule 3(1)(ii) by insertion of Second Proviso by Notification No. 5....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....In this case, admittedly, the goods in question were very much in India and were being tested here in India only. Only the Test Report was being sent by courier or by internet transmission by the Appellant. Therefore, he submits that after 01/03/2008, the situation has changed and benefit cannot be given to the Appellant. 5. Heard both sides and perused the documents. 6. On going through the....