2023 (9) TMI 1386
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nant Bijay Singh] Member (Judicial) And [Arun Baroka] Member (Technical) For the Appellant : Mr. Ajay Kumar Jain, Mr. Sourit Arora, Advocates For the Respondents : Mr. Dhrubajit Saikia, Advocate ORDER 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 28th March, 2023 passed by the 'National Company Law Tribunal, Bench-III, New Delhi (hereinafter referred as to 'the Adjudicating Authority) b....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Appellant Company is 75 years old woman and was suffering from severe illness, surviving on Oxygen Supplements, B-PAP in her day to day life. Therefore, the Authorized Representative of the Appellant company could not get the status of the petition filed before the Adjudicating Authority and was thus dependant on his counsel. Thereafter, the Appellant had inquired about the status of her petition....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... in the impugned order. Further, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent has submitted that the Appellant has neither given any cogent reasons in the application seeking restoration of the Application for 150 days' delay in filing the Restoration Application nor filed any application for condonation of delay to condone those days. It is submitted that non-appearance of the Appellant has been recorded in th....


TaxTMI
TaxTMI