2023 (9) TMI 957
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... ORDER Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel representing State and Sri Gopal Verma learned counsel appearing for respondent nos. 4 & 5. The petitioner is aggrieved by an order dated 14.08.2023 contained in annexure no.10 to the writ petition whereby the liability has been fixed upon it to pay penalty in terms of Section 129 (1) b of the C.G.S.T. Act, 2017. Further ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....upon the petitioner inasmuch as by virtue of the aforesaid circular the petitioner was liable to be treated as the owner of the goods and consequently the provision of section 129(1)(a) alone could have been invoked. Learned State counsel submits that in respect of the demand of tax, the petitioner has the remedy of filing an appeal U/s 107 of the Act. So far as the prayer for release the goods a....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nment of goods, then either the consigner or the consignee should be deemed to be the owner. If the invoice or any other specified document is not accompanying the consignment of goods, then in such case, the proper officer should determine who should be declared as the owner of the goods. In view of the fact that the department does not dispute the petitioner's assertion that the goods in tr....