2008 (12) TMI 159

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lowing case laws:- (i) Gian Chand and Others v. State of Punjab -1983 (13) E.L.T. 1365 (S.C.). (ii) Asst. Collector v. Daljit Singh and Others -1992 (58) E.L.T. 54 (P&H) (iii) E. Eswara Reddy & Another v. CC, Hyderabad-II - 2006 (196) E.L.T. 410 (Tri.-Bang.) = 2006 (75) RLT 894 (Tri.-Bang) 3. He further argues that though the Appellant had given a statement to Customs on the date of his apprehension, he has subsequently retracted the statement in reply to the show cause notice and hence the original statement given by the Appellant has no evidentiary value and the same should be discarded. 4. He further states that the Appellant had produced a cash memo before the Magistrate which has been verified by Customs, but the same has not been....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... and nowhere he stated that he had legally acquired the same. The appellant did not also retract his statement till submitting his reply to the show cause notice on 20-3-2001 i.e. after nearly 7 (seven) months from the date of his original statement. He further states that the acquittal by the Magistrate was on technical grounds and therefore the Customs is not precluded from deciding the matter by way of departmental adjudication. 8. Shri A.K. Sharma, learned Departmental Representative (JDR) also states that the subsequent claim made by the Appellant in the reply to the show cause notice is totally at variance with his initial statement and obviously the same is tutored and cannot be accepted. 9. After hearing both the sides and perusal....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n done by the Authorities below. I am also of the view that the statement which has been given by the Appellant under Section 108 of the Act is admissible as a piece of vital evidence since there is no allegation of it having been obtained illegally and also in view of the fact that the same has not been retracted till reply to the show cause notice submitted after 7 (seven) months from the date of the statement. 11. If the Appellant was carrying gold obtained legally, he would have produced the necessary documentary evidence to the Authorities and he would not have carried the same in a surreptitious manner hiding the same taped to his feet inside his shoes. The submission by the learned Counsel that the Appellant had given a receipt in t....