Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2009 (1) TMI 191

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Respondent. [Order per : P.K. Das, Member (J) (for the Bench)].- Heard both sides and perused the records. 2. The appellant received the services during the period from January, 2004 to July, 2004 and payment was made to the foreign based company, who have no office in India. The appellant paid the tax on such payment under the mistaken impression under the category of "Consulting Engineeri....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d liable for paying service tax prior to 1-1-2005 notwithstanding the amendment in Rule 2(1)(d) of the Service Tax Rules under Notification No.12/2004. 18. We thus concur in the view expressed in the case of Aditya Cement and Ispat Industries, supra. The issue is thus answered in favour of the assessee and it is held that as a recipient of the 'consulting engineer' service from outside India, the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n the decision of the Tribunal in the case of M/s. JCB India Ltd. v. CST, Delhi, Final Order No. ST/208/08 dated 6-8-08 [2008 (12) S.T.R. 714 (Tri.-Del.)]. 6. In view of the Larger Bench decision of the appellants own case, we hold that the appellant is not liable to pay service tax. On perusal of the aforesaid decision, we find that in the said cases, it has been held that the appellant deposite....