2009 (1) TMI 189
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....eena, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order].- Vide Final Order Nos. 332-333/08, dated 7-4-2008 [2008 (11) S.T.R. 145 (Tri.-Chennai)], the Tribunal upheld the liability of service tax and penalty against the applicants herein on the ground that they were not only procuring purchase orders for the principal but also undertaking clearing and forwarding operations in connection with the sale of goods fo....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....15 (SC)]. The applicants further submits that an error arose in not setting aside the penalty imposed on them in the light of the amnesty scheme announced by the Government. 2. The prayer for rectification is opposed by learned SDR on the ground that the relevant agreements were not placed before the Bench so as to enable the Bench to determine what was the main activity and incidental activity....
TaxTMI