Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (9) TMI 533

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., invoices were raised by M/s. Bedeil General Trading LLC, Dubai, UAE at a unit price of USD 15 per kilogram. The assessment group did not accept the unit price declared by appellant and sought to enhance the same. Based on the directions of the higher courts, Bills of Entry were assessed provisionally at the value determined by the department and the goods were released to the appellant on the strength of 50% of the differential duty covered by the bank guarantee and the rest by personal bond. Thereupon, department issued Show Cause Notice dated 29.11.2011 alleging that the goods have been undervalued and same has to be enhanced on the basis of contemporaneous imports. After due process of law, the original authority rejected the transacti....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sfy with regard to various parameters in the nature of quality, quantity and the manufacturer / supplier. For these reasons itself, the import of 25.11.2010 cannot be compared with that of the appellant's imports. The appellant had furnished details of various bills of entry for import of raw silk yarn in hank, from Uzbekistan through Chennai Port from 12.4.2010 to 30.11.2010. The value declared for these imports was between 13 to 15 USD per kilogram. The appellant in present case has declared the value as 15 USD per kilogram which reconciles with the imports during the relevant time. However, without giving any cogent reasons department has rejected the transaction value relying upon the single bill of entry dated 25.11.2010. The decision ....