2023 (9) TMI 491
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....br>Honourable Mr.Justice C.Saravanan For the Petitioner : Mr.P.J.Rishikesh For the R1 to R4 : Dr.B.Ramaswamy Senior Standing Counsel For the R5 : Mr.J.C.Durairaj Additional Government Pleader ORDER Dr.B.Ramaswamy, learned Senior Standing Counsel takes notice on behalf of the first to fourth respondents and Mr.J.C.Durairaj, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice on behalf....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....peals) upheld the order of the Assessing Officer vide order dated 27.11.2006. 6. A further appeal of the petitioner before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in I.T.(SS)A.No.17/Mds/07 for the block assessment period 1988-1989 to 1998-1999 was allowed on the ground that there was violation principles of natural justice by the ITAT Bench, Chennai on 30.03.2007. The Income Tax Appellate Trib....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....preceded the order of ITAT dated 30.03.2007 and therefore has no vigour. 10. It is therefore submitted that despite the same, the order of attachment is reflected in the registers maintained in respect of the property before the Registration Department. It is therefore submitted that the order is liable to be quashed and the petition be allowed. 11. I have considered the arguments advanced b....
TaxTMI