TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2023 (9) TMI 384
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, Ld CIT-A erred in sustaining the order passed by Ld AO u/s 143(3) without appreciating that the Assessment Order is bad in law, void-ab- initio and is liable to quashed. (No show cause notice). 2) That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, Ld CIT-A erred in sustaining the order passed by Ld AO u/s 143(3) without appreciating that the depreciation of 34,876/-on account of electric installation is an integral part of plant and machinery. 3) That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, Ld CIT-A erred in sustaining the order passed by Ld AO u/s 143(3) without appreciating that • the creditors have already submitted th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... for scrutiny under Computer-Assisted Scrutiny Selection ("CASS"). Statutory notice was issued on 08.04.2016 and duly served upon the assessee company. Thereafter, the Assessing Officer ("AO") framed the assessment after giving opportunity to the assessee. Ld. Counsel for the assessee attended the proceedings on behalf of the assessee and filed various details before the Assessing Authority. The Assessing Authority thereafter, framed the assessment u/s 143(3) of the Act dated 30.12.2017 by making addition on account of bad debts of INR 12,60,319/- and disallowance of expenditure u/s 37(1) of the Act on adhoc basis amounting to INR 4,20,009/-. Further, the AO made disallowance of depreciation in respect of electricity installation amounting ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.....2 raised by the assessee is against the sustaining of disallowance of depreciation of INR 34,876/-. 10. Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the authorities below failed to appreciate the fact that electricity installations are being integral part of the plant & machinery. Therefore, the depreciation should be allowed as a plant & machinery. 11. On the other hand, Ld. Sr. DR relied upon the orders of the authorities below and contented that there is no ambiguity under law. Electricity installations are of different rate of depreciation and the authorities below have rightly disallowed the claim. 12. We have heard Ld. Authorized Representatives of the parties and perused the material available on record. In the case in hand,....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., Ld.CIT(A) ought to have allowed the appeal of the assessee. 15. On the other hand, Ld. Sr. DR opposed these submissions and supported the orders of the authorities below. 16. We have heard Ld. Authorized Representatives of the parties and perused the material available on record. We find that Ld.CIT(A) has given a finding on facts by observing as under on these three creditors:- ii) "M/s Lalit Wafers and Namkeen (Rs. 1,52,000/- cr) The appellant furnished the confirmation from Sh. Lalit Arora, Prop. M/s Lalit Wafers and Namkeen along with his ITR during the assessment proceedings. From the perusal of the same it was noted by the AO that Sh. Lalit Arora has not shown any income from M/s Lalit Wafers. On the basis of....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ing payments after the completion of assessment proceedings and during the pendency of the appellate proceedings. Even the copy of the bank statement has not been made available to show that cheques issued in the month of January 2019 have been got encashed. The appellant has failed to show the genuineness of such sundry creditor. The onus was upon the appellant to explain nature of such credit outstanding in its books of accounts. The appellant has failed to do so. Keeping in view the above facts and discussion it is held that the AO was justified in making addition of Rs. 10,78,792/-, the same is hereby confirmed. (iv) M/s Accurate Tools Pvt. Ltd. (Rs. 1,05,952/-cr) The appellant has furnished details of trade receivable....