Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (9) TMI 296

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ing authority and directed the appellant to pay back the said amount along with interest and also directed that the same should be deposited with the Consumer Welfare Fund. 2. Briefly the facts of the present case are that the appellant is providing service under the category of Rent-a-Cab operator to Nestle India Ltd. A show cause notice was issued to the appellant in the year 2007 for recovery of the service tax amounting to Rs. 1,03,668/-. 3. After following the due process, demand of service tax was confirmed by the Assistant Commissioner, Sangrur vide Order-in-Original dated 26.12.2007. The appellant deposited an amount of Rs. 1,29,585/- with the department, as of duty, penalty and interest and filed appeal before the Commissioner (A....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....but the Ld. Commissioner has not granted them the opportunity of hearing and pass the impugned order ex-parte. 6. Ld. Counsel further submitted that admittedly the dates of hearing as mentioned in the show cause notice are 18.01.2011, 20.01.2011, 24.01.2011 and 25.01.2011. She further submitted that the Commissioner has given consecutive dates of hearing in one go. She further submitted that as per the settled proposition of law that if the authority has given consecutive dates of hearing in one go, it will be deemed to be only one opportunity of hearing. For this submission, she relied upon the decision of the Mennakshi Associates (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Noida 2009 (245) ELT 362 (Tri. Del.) Wherein Tribunal has held t....