2009 (3) TMI 107
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....spondent. [Order per : M. Veeraiyan, Member (T) (Oral)].- The application for early hearing made in pursuance of the order of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi dated 14-11-2008 was taken up and the same was allowed as it was submitted that the licence of the applicant stands revoked vide order dated 9-10-07 and that the applicant and their employees are struggling for livelihood and are facing seve....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s of enquiry conducted under the provisions of CHALR, 2004, the Commissioner held that the appellants have failed to ascertain the genuineness of the documents relating to the export of the goods and have transacted business for non-existent/non-traceable exporter and has not taken sufficient precaution before taking up export on behalf of such exporter and accordingly, ordered revocation of licen....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....f the vehicle sent by the exporter and the consignments were actually received by the G Card Holder of the appellant firm. Further, the consignments tallied in description and did not contain any prohibited items for export. They have no means of ensuring the genuineness of address given in the IEC certificate issued by the DGFT. He also submits that the appellant and their employees have heavily ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....herefore, the value was inflated. However, it was claimed that the appellant was not aware of the poor quality of the consignment which was sought to be exported. We find that no evidence has been relied upon to show that the appellant personally knew about the poor quality of the goods sought to be exported with intention to claim ineligible drawback. It was also submitted by the learned Advocate....
TaxTMI
TaxTMI