Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (9) TMI 205

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....1), all dated 11.05.2023, involving proceedings u/s. 201 (1) r.w.s. 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short "the Act"). All four cases called twice. None appears at these assessee's behest. They are accordingly proceeded ex-parte. 2. It emerges during the course of hearing with the able assistance coming from Revenue side that all these four assessee's viz., M/s. Marvel Edge Realtors Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Marvel Landmarks Private Ltd., M/s. Marvel Omega Builders Private Ltd., and M/s. Marvel Sigma Homes Private Ltd., corresponding four appeals ITA. Nos. 812 to 815/PUN./2023 seek to reverse both the lower authorities identical action raising sec. 201 r.w.s. 201(1A) TDS and interest demands of Rs. 10,23,214/-; Rs. 88,29,905/-; Rs. 2,70,20,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ssessing Officer in the order and the summary of same is as under:- Sr. No. Section TDS u/s 201 (1) Interest u/s 201(1A)(ii) Total liability payable 1 194C 43,945 10,824 54,769 2 194A 6,32,875 1,51,890 7,84,765 3 194J 1,46,757 35,559 1,82,316 4 194I 1,100 264 1,364   Total 8,24,677 1,98,537 10,23,214 Accordingly, the Assessing Officer held that the assessee is liable to pay a total amount of Rs. 10,23,214/- on account of TDS not deposited under various sections and interest u/s 201(1A)(ii) of the Act. 4. Aggrieved by the above order, the appellant is in appeal with the following grounds of appeal:- 1. The Id. AO erred in....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... however, no written submission in support of grounds of appeal raised was filed by the appellant. Accordingly, in the interest of natural justice, one final notice was issued to the appellant on 18/04/2023 vide which following was communicated to the appellant: "It is observed from this office records that the present appeal in your case was fixed for hearing from time to time. However on the dates of hearing no submission in support of grounds raised was filed. Accordingly, you are being provided a final opportunity of presenting your case vide this notice, In case you desire a personal hearing, in that case, hearing may be attended on the date and time fixed vide this notice. In case, you want to file a written submission, same ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t and there was no assistance from the assessee. Further, Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. B. Bhattachargee & Another (118 ITR 461 at page 477-478) held that the appeal does not mean, mere filing of the memo of appeal but effectively pursing the same. 8. In the given circumstances, there is no other option left with the undersigned but to decide the appeal on the basis of documents that have been submitted by the assessee as part of the appeal memo i.e. grounds of appeal and statement of facts. 9. The only issue raised by the appellant is regarding the demand raised by the ITO, TDS-I, Pune u/s 201 of the Act. In the statement of facts filed along with the appeal, the appellant has submitted that th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....1A)(ii) dated 27/06/2018 is upheld and the grounds raised by the appellant are DISMISSED. 4. We have given our thoughtful consideration to the assessee's identical pleadings raising the sole substantive grievance of correctness of sec. 201(1) r.w.s. 201(1A) demands and Revenue's vehement arguments supporting the same at length. We find from a perusal of the case files that all these assessees are fair enough in not disputing their very liability to deduct TDS u/secs. 194A, 194C, 194I and 194J paid in F.Y. 2016-2017 relevant to A.Y. 2017-18; as the case may be, involving varying sums, to the recipients concerned. Their only ground before us is that the payees concerned have offered the same to tax and therefore, they duly stand assessed. ....