Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (9) TMI 145

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... First Appellate Authority holding that the amount received by the assessee from sale/distribution of software is not royalty within the meaning of Article 12(3) of India - Singapore Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). 3. Briefly the facts are, the assessee is a non resident corporate entity incorporated under the laws of Singapore and a tax resident of Singapore. For the assessment year under dispute assessee filed its return of income on 31.03.2018 declaring total income of Rs. 1,56,50,870/-. As observed by the Assessing Officer, the assessee is engaged in the business of providing end to end software and cloud technology solution to its clients. In the year under consideration the assessee entered into certain transactions in ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 5. After considering the submissions of the assessee in the context of facts and materials available on record and following the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CIT (2021) 125 taxman.com 42 (SC). Learned Commissioner (Appeals) ultimately accepted assessee's claim that the revenue earned by the assessee is in the nature of sale of a copyrighted article and not for transferring the right to use any copyright. Thus, he held that the amount received is not in the nature of royalty but in the nature of business income and in absence of a Permanent Establishment (PE) is not taxable in India. 6. Before us, learned Departmental Representative strongly relied upon ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....distributor who purchases software from non-resident manufacturers/sellers and re-sales them to distributors/end users in India. She submitted, when the assessee itself does not have any right in the copyright and purchases from another party for re-sale, how can it transfer such non-existent right to others? Thus, she submitted, assessee's case is squarely covered by the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CIT (supra). Further, she submitted the decision of the Tribunal in case of Microsoft Corporation (supra) relied upon by the Revenue could be of no help as in an appeal preferred by the said assessee the Hon'ble Delhi High Court has accepted assessee's claim and reverse....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....casion to examine when the consideration received from sale of software can be considered to be in the nature of royalty. The Hon'ble Supreme Court had segregated the transactions relating to the sale of software to following four categories: i) "The first category deals with cases in which computer software is purchased directly by an end-user, resident in India, from a foreign, non-resident supplier or manufacturer. ii) The second category of cases deals with resident Indian companies that act as distributors or resellers, by purchasing computer software from foreign, non-resident suppliers or manufacturers and then reselling the same to resident Indian end-users. iii) The third category concerns cases wherein t....