2006 (6) TMI 113

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....9, 192, 326 and 532 of 2006. A. S. Rao for the appellant. Ajay Singh for the respondents. JUDGMENT 1. Not on board. 2. By consent of the parties all these appeals are taken on board for hearing since both parties have agreed that the questions of law raised in all these appeals have been covered by the judgment of this court in the case of Abdulgafar A. Nadiadwala v. Asst. CIT [2004] 267 ITR ....