Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (8) TMI 1189

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt years 2010-11 & 2011- 112. Since common issues are raised in these appeals, we are, therefore, proceeding to dispose them off by this consolidated order for the sake of convenience. 2. There is a delay of 99 days in the filing of appeals in ITA Nos. 269 to 272/Nag/2022. The condonation applications have been filed. We are satisfied with the reasons. The delay is condoned and the appeals are admitted for disposal. 3. The only issue raised in these appeals is against the confirmation of the orders passed by the AOs u/s. 201(1)/201(1A) of the Act treating the assessee in default for non-deduction of tax at source u/s 194A on interest paid/credited to its customers and also non-condonation of delay by the ld. CIT(A) in presenting the a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... in March, 2016, when it was found that they were paying/crediting interest into their clients' accounts for a sum in excess and the maximum amount not chargeable to tax on receiving Form Nos.15G/15H. The case of the assessee-branches is that they received notice individually about the default in compliance, but were not technically equipped to handle the issue. Some branches appointed consultants at individual level, who also kept on changing. Thereafter, the Zonal office of Bank of India, Nagpur, took up the matter for all the branches of Nagpur zone by appointing a centralized consultant, who filed the appeals for all the branches in coordination with income-tax department and addressed all the pending disputes anent to this issue. The d....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Section 201(3) deals with the time limit for passing of the order under section 201. The relevant part of section 201(3), prior to its substitution by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2014 w.e.f. 01-10-2014, reads as under : "No order shall be made under sub-section (1) deeming a person to be an assessee in default for failure to deduct the whole or any part of the tax from a person resident in India, at any time after the expiry of- (i) two years from the end of the financial year in which the statement is filed in a case where the statement referred to in section 200 has been filed; (ii) four years from the end of the financial year in which payment is made or credit is given, in any other case : Provided that ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tement. Opining so, he held that the order passed by the AO was within time limit as the case fell under section 201(3)(ii) of the Act. In our opinion, the ld. CIT(A) has taken a hyper technical view of the provision, which, in fact, contemplates only two situations, viz., where the statement is filed and where it is not filed. Neither the provision provides for filing separate statement for each client, nor the necessary form permits so. The crux is that if the statement is filed, the case falls under clause (i). Simply some mistake, if at all, here and there in the statement does not erase the filing of the statement. To put it simply, once the statement is filed by the bank branch, the same has to be treated as a case falling u/s. 201(3)....