Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (8) TMI 1171

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., we are, therefore, proceeding to dispose them off by this consolidated order for the sake of convenience. 2. Ground No. 1 challenging the initiation of re-assessment proceedings, was not pressed by the ld. AR. The same is, therefore, dismissed. 3. The second ground is against the addition of Rs. 3,47,760/- made by the AO in Paddy Basmati account. 4. Succinctly, the facts of the case are that the assessee is a non-resident, who filed his return declaring total income at Rs. 10,60,310/-. It transpired that the assessee had not offered profit earned on certain transactions made on National Spot Exchange Ltd. (NSEL). On this basis, notice u/s. 148 was issued. Compliance was made by the assessee. During the course of assessment proceedings,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sets of transactions of Paddy Buy and Paddy Sell on 19-03-2013 and 11-03-2013, which were not recorded in the books of account for the year under consideration. The assessee kept raising a claim before the AO as well as the DRP that these transactions were recorded in the subsequent year. However, the assessee failed to substantiate his contention. Neither any material could be placed before the AO/DRP to demonstrate the booking of profit from such transactions in the immediately succeeding year, nor the position has improved any further before the Tribunal. In view of the admitted facts that the transactions did take place, and profit from them was neither recorded in the year under consideration nor the next year, we hold that the AO was ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....uantity of GOLDM by 05-02-2013 and sale of such quantity by 05-03-2013. The purchase transaction got actually concluded on 04-02-2013. A copy of Contract-cum-bill dt. 04-02-2013 has been placed at page 37 of the paper book with value of Rs. 48,47,160/-. Similarly, the sale transaction got actually concluded on 01-03-2013. A copy of Contract-cum-bill dated 01.03.2013 has been placed at page 38 of the paper book with value of Rs. 47,04,514/-. We have also gone through the ledger of transactions of Anand Rathi Commodities Ltd. with the assessee, whose copy has been placed at page 25 onwards of the paper book, showing Buy Sauda date as 01-02-2013 and the actual transactions date of sale and purchase, namely, 01-03-2013 and 04-02-2013. In fact, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... facts in entirety, we are of the considered opinion that it would be just and fair if the disallowance is restricted to 20% towards personal element in expenses and unverified expenses. The assessee gets the relief accordingly. A.Y. 2014-15 : 10. The first ground regarding initiation of re-assessment proceedings was not pressed by the ld. AR. The same is, therefore, dismissed. 11. The second ground is against the addition of profit of Rs. 1,72,844/- on the transaction in Paddy Basmati. From the Sauda report received from Anand Rathi Commodities Ltd., the AO observed that there was one transaction of Buy Paddy Basmati of Rs. 1,26,67,200/- and the corresponding Sell Paddy of Rs. 1,28,97,750/-, with differential amount of Rs. 2,30,550/-. Af....