Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (8) TMI 1147

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ntral Excise Act, 1944. 2. The appellant is having Service Tax Registration under Section 69 of Chapter 5 of the Finance Act, 1994 read with Rule 4 of Service Tax Rules, 1994. The appellant filed the refund claim of Rs.2,24,856/- on 22.07.2021 on account of excess payment of service tax during the period April, 2017 to June, 2017 as they had paid Rs.12,70,409/-, whereas the service tax payable was Rs.10,47,573/- due to cancellation of some of the invoices. The excess payment of Rs.2,24,856/- was available for adjustment for payment of service liability for further period but as the service tax has been subsumed under new tax regime of GST w.e.f 1.7.2017, the claimant carried forward the said excess amount of service tax into GST TRAN-I. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ore the Adjudicating Authority as well as before the Commissioner (Appeals), which have been passed in similar circumstances, where due to cancellation of some of the invoices, the amount of service tax relating to the cancelled invoices stood in excess, which was credited in TRANS-I under GST law and was reversed along with payment of interest, in view of an objection taken by the GST Department. The Tribunal categorically observed:- "5. I have considered the submissions made by both the sides and perused the records. The facts in the present case is not under dispute that the appellant have paid the excess service tax during the quarter April to June, 2017, however, the appellant under bona fide belief transferred the said excess....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... binding on the authorities below. I am, therefore, of the view that the impugned order deserves to be set aside on this ground alone. Applying the ratio of the above-mentioned case, I find that the assessee deposited the service tax on 6.7.2017 and in view of the GST w.e.f. 1.7.2017, the excess amount of service tax was carried forward to TRANS-I but the said amount was reversed only on 24.11.2020 on the objection raised by the Department. If I take the date of reversal i.e. 24.11.2020, the refund claim filed on 22.07.2021 is well within the period of one year in terms of Section 11 B of the Act. That since the Commissioner (Appeals) have decided only the issue of limitation under Section 11 B and have not decided the other issues raised b....