Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (8) TMI 1083

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Standing Counsel of Income Tax Department Mr. Alok Shahi, Advocate JUDGMENT ( Per : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ) 1. Whether the amendments made to the Income Tax Act, 1961 and the circular issued regulating the period in which a Refund Application is to be filed would result in the frustration of the claim of refund made by the assessee, is the question raised in the writ petition. 2. The assessee, the petitioner herein, is concerned with the demand made for various years and the refund for the Assessment Year 2010-11 relatable to the Financial Year 2009- 10. 3. Shri Ajay Kumar Rastogi, learned Senior Counsel specifically referred to Section 200A of the Income Tax Act which was brought into the statute as on 01.04.2010; w....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Counsel refers to Karimtharuvi Tea Estate Ltd. v. State of Kerala; (1966) 60 ITR 262 (SC) to urge that any amendment brought out to the Income Tax Act as on the 1st of April of a financial year would apply to the assessments for that year and any amendment brought in after the first day of April would not apply to the assessment carried out in that year, even if the assessment is made after the amendment came into force. Hence, the amendment made on the first day of April of any financial year applies to the assessment of the prior financial year also, which would be carried out in the financial year in which the amendment is enforced as on 1st of April. Kerala Financial Corporation & Others v. CIT; (1994) 210 ITR 129 (SC) is relied on to c....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sions pointed out, we are of the opinion that the applicability of Section 200A need not be dealt with at all; for it being irrelevant to decide the issue. Section 200A speaks of processing of statements of tax deducted at source. It delineates the process by which the statement of tax deducted at source, filed under Section 200A, has to be processed and speaks of an intimation to be sent to the deductor as per clause (e). Clause (f) of Section 200A (1) also mandates that the amount of refund to the deductor in pursuance of such determination under clause (d), shall be granted to the deductor. It is the proviso which mandates the intimation to be sent within one year from the end of the financial year in which the statement is filed. In fac....