Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (8) TMI 1039

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r. Adv. Mr. Arunabh Chowdhury, Sr. Adv. Mr. Abhay Jadeja, Adv. Mr. Varun Satiya, Adv. Mrs. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, Adv. Mrs. Pragya Baghel, AOR Mr. Karma Dorjee, Adv. Mr. Deechen W. Lachungpa, Adv. ORDER 1. The Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise seeks a review of a judgment dated 10 April 2023 in Civil Appeal No 2753 of 2023. 2. The appeal before this Court arises from an order dated 10 February 2022 of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ["CESTAT"] at Mumbai. The CESTAT allowed an appeal instituted by the respondent for a refund of service tax in relation to a rental transaction with the Mumbai International Airport Limited for the period 1 October 2011 to 30 June 2017. 3. The respondent engages in the busines....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the CESTAT at its West Zonal Bench in Mumbai. Hence, it is urged that all the appeals ought to have been set down for hearing together. A request for tagging this appeal with the appeals pending in this Court was made. 6. In its judgment dated 10 April 2023, this Court affirmed the judgment of the CESTAT noting that against a judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay dated 28 November 2018 in Al Cuisine Pvt Ltd v Union of India Writ Petition No. 8034 of 2018, a Special Leave Petition SLP (C) 33011 of 2018 was dismissed by an order dated 14 December 2018 of this Court. 7. During the course of the judgment of which review is sought, this Court referred to the view taken by the Kerala High Court in CIAL Duty Free and Retail Serv....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tail Services Ltd (supra). None of the submissions of the Union of India have been recorded or considered. The judgment only adverts to the submissions of the respondents. 13. The Additional Solicitor General submitted that the decisions of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay and the Kerala High Court pertain to goods and not to the levy of service tax on the renting of immovable property. Whether this would make any difference to ultimate outcome is debatable, and would, therefore, require substantial consideration. 14. At this stage, absent such a consideration in the judgment under review and since the issue which is raised would have large consequential ramifications, we are of the considered view that the review should be allo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....544 - 2019 CESTAT West Zonal Bench at Mumbai RA-85493-2018 26-10-18 10 Flemingo Duty Free Shop (P) Ltd.   17544 - 2019 CESTAT West Zonal Bench at Mumbai RA-85498-2018 26-10-18 11 Flemingo Duty Free Shop (P) Ltd. 17544 - 2019 CESTAT West Zonal Bench at Mumbai RA-85499- 2018 26-10-18 12 Flemingo Duty Free Shop (P) Ltd. 17544 - 2019 CESTAT West Zonal Bench at Mumbai RA-85500-2018 26-10-18 13 Flemingo Duty Free Shop (P) Ltd. 17544 - 2019 CESTAT West Zonal Bench at Mumbai RA-85501- 2018 26-10-18 14 Flemingo Duty Free Shop (P) Ltd. 17544 - 2019 CESTAT West Zonal Bench at Mumbai RA-85502- 2018 26-10-18 15 Flemingo Duty Free Shop (P) Ltd. ....