Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New Feature Launched βœ•

Introducing the β€œIn Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.

  • βš–οΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
  • πŸ” Narrow down results with higher precision

Try it now in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (3) TMI 2030

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he appellant Shri Vivek Pandey, DR for the respondent Final Order No: 50457-50458/2019 ORDER Per Archana Wadhwa After hearing both the sides, we note that the appellant is an institution engaged in providing 'school education'. Apart from that they are also providing franchisee services, which are taxable services. Accordingly, the appellant was availing the benefit of Cenvat Credit of se....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....use Notices stand culminated into the impugned order passed by the Commissioner vide which he confirmed the demand along with interest as also by imposition of penalties. 3. Ld. Advocate appearing for the appellant, fairly agrees that the various input services, which were primarily used for constructions of the school building etc. for the purpose of providing school education were not cenvatabl....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....llant has a good case on merits also in respect of the said demand covered by Show Cause Notice dated 18/04/13. 4. After hearing Ld. AR and going through the impugned order, we find that admittedly the plea of limitation was not raised before the authorities. However, the same being a mixed question of fact and law, we permit the appellant to raise the same at Tribunal level. We, further note tha....