2023 (4) TMI 1244
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s receipt of Rs.1,44,12,926/- @ 0.5%. Prayed that there is no delay on the part of the Appellant. The statutory auditor was not appointed timely by the Register of Cooperative Society which was not in the hands of the Appellant only after completion of Statutory Audit, Tax audit was done. There is reasonable cause u/s 273B for delay, therefore, the penalty levied kindly be cancelled. 2. Brief facts of the case are that in this case the assessee filed its return of income after the due date for filing of return of income under the provision of Section 139(1) of the Act declaring NIL income. The assessee is a Primary Agriculture Co-operative Society. Assessment in this case was completed on 24.10.2016 determining total income of the assessee at Rs.Nil. During the course of assessment, the AO noticed that the assessee has failed to get its accounts audited within the specified due date i.e. 30.11.2014, however, the audit was done in this case on 18.09.2015, thereby committing default within the meaning of Section 44AB of the Act. Accordingly, the AO initiated penalty proceedings u/s.271B of the Act. 3. Against the above order of AO, the assessee preferred appeal before the ld. CIT(....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....it report has been filed on 05.03.2016, which is before the date of completion of assessment proceedings u/s.143(3) of the Act. In other words, although the assessee has filed tax audit report beyond the stipulated period, but such tax audit report was made available to the AO before he completes assessment proceedings. The assessee has given reasons for delay in filing tax audit report. As per which, the audit of accounts of society done by the Dept. of Cooperative Audit, could not be completed on or before 31.10.2015 and said delay was not in the hands of the assessee. Therefore, there is a reasonable cause for not filing the tax audit report within prescribed time limit ad thus, penalty cannot be levied. We find merits in the submission of the assessee for the simple reason that non-filing of audit report within the due date is a venial technical breach without any mala fide intention on the part of the assessee. Because, completion of audit of books of accounts of the society is under the control of Dept. of Cooperative Audit and thus, unless the Dept. of Cooperative Audit completes audit, the assessee cannot file return of income along with tax audit report. Therefore, we are ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d the control of the assessee, we find merit in the contention of the Id. counsel of the assessee that the delay in completion of statutory audit, which caused the failure of the assessee to obtain and furnish the tax audit report under section 4AB, was due to the reasons beyond the control of the assessee and the same constituted the sufficient cause for its failure to comply with the requirement of section 44AB. Moreover, the tax audit report obtaining belatedly was filed by the assessee along with its return of income for the year under consideration on 05.01.2010 and the same, therefore, was available to the Assessing Officer while making the assessment of the assessee for the year under consideration. The default on the part of the assessee in obtaining and furnishing the tax audit report by the specified date thus was technical or venial in nature. Having regard to all these facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the view that it is not a fit case to impose penalty under section 271B and cancelling the penalty so imposed by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the ld. CIT(Appeals), we allow this appeal of the assessee." 9. In the present case also the assessee co....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....990. The auditors raised some points in the audit report which were required to be looked into and complied with by the assessee. After complying with the various points the assessee submitted return on 26-2-1990. It is not a case in which the assessee did not take proper care to comply with various statutory provisions. No default is attributable to the act and conduct of the assessee. Therefore, in my opinion, it is not a fit case for levy of penalty under section 271B of the IT Act. The penalty levied is held to be unjustified and is cancelled. In the light of above finding I deem it unnecessary to go into several other legal issues raised by the learned counsel for the assessee. The penalty imposed is cancelled. v) Mathana Model Co-op Credit & Services Society Ltd., [2008] 299 ITR 70 (Punjab & Haryana), wherein the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court held as under :- Section 271B, read with section 273B, of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Penalty - For failure to get accounts audited - Assessment year 2004-05 - As assessee-co-operative society failed to get its accounts audited within stipulated date, a show-cause notice under section 271B was issued to it - Assessee submitted....
TaxTMI
TaxTMI