2023 (8) TMI 770

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ileshwar Sharma a/w Ms. Shilpa Goel For the Respondent : Mr. Jignesh R. Shah ORDER 1. The following four substantial questions of law have been proposed in the appeal. QUESTION OF LAW 1. In the facts and circumstances of the case and in Law whether the Hon'ble ITAT order is correct in view of the Hon'ble Supreme Court decision in N.K. Protein Ltd. Which is upheld 100% addition....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....essary. 2. It is appellant's case that respondent was carrying on sole proprietary business in the name and style of M/s. Shoe Box Inc. Respondent had a retail store selling footwear, bags, belts, wallets etc. Respondent filed his return of income on 29th September 2009 for Assessment Year 2009-10 declaring a total income of Rs. 6,64,570/-. Regular assessment was completed under Section 143(3) ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Rs. 90,33,191/- as bogus and added the same to the returned income for Assessment Year 2009-10. The assessment under Section 143 read with Section 147 of the Act was completed on 30th March 2014 determining total income at Rs. 97,58,670/-. 3. The Assessment Order was impugned before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT[A]). The CIT[A] partly allowed the appeal. It was also observed tha....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....come up before us where similar issues have been raised. It has been repeatedly held that Section 69 of the Act was not applicable to these bogus purchases as only profit has to be added in the income of the assessee. The only issue that requires to be considered is with respect to the extent of ad-hoc dis-allowance with respect to bogus purchases. Whether purchases were bogus or whether the parti....