2023 (8) TMI 275
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e Respondent : Smt. Ranu Biswas, Addl. CIT-DR, appeared. ORDER PER SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER: The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 30.05.2022 of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (hereinafter referred to as the 'CIT(A)') passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'). 2. The assessee is aggrieved by the action o....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d first. The ld. counsel has further submitted that the last date for issue of notice u/s 143(2) was on 30.09.2015. He has further submitted that though the notice has been shown to be signed on 30.09.2015 itself however, the same was sent at the email address of the assessee 03.11.2015. He, therefore, has submitted that by mere signing of the notice by the concerned Assessing Officer, it would no....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....on 30.09.2015 and hence it cannot be said that the notice u/s 143(2) of the Act was time barred. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the records. The notice in this case has been shown to be signed on 30.09.2015, however, the same was emailed to the assessee on 03.11.2015. The Hon'ble Jurisdictional Calcutta High Court in the case of Marudhar Vintrade Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....see. So far as the contention of the ld. counsel that the issue of notice u/s 143(2) of the Act within the prescribed period in relation to the reassessment proceedings u/s 147/148 was not mandatory, we find that the issue has been settled by the various High Courts holding that even in the case of reassessment proceedings u/s 147/148 of the Act, the issuance of notice within the specified period ....
TaxTMI