2023 (8) TMI 186

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., Authorized Representative - for the Respondent ORDER None is present for the appellant. On the last date of hearing, it was made clear that no further adjournment shall be granted to the appellant. The absence is also objected by learned Departmental Representative mentioning that there have already been several adjournments and that the appeal pertain to the year 2016. In the given circumstan....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....12-13 with respect to the fee they have collected under the head of Tahbazari, Haat Bazar and shop keepers/daily vendors for commerce. Accordingly, the demand for the aforesaid entire period totalling to Rs. 11,02,834/- was proposed to be recovered along with the interest and the appropriate penalty. The proposal was confirmed by the impugned order-in-original No. 08 of 30th April 2015, the appeal....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of land with or without structure for the purpose incidental to agriculture is not liable to tax. We observe the demand in question is with reference to renting of immovable property for the sale of agricultural produce i.e. for the purpose incidental to agriculture. Hence, subsequent to introduction of Section 66D in the Finance Act from 01.07.2012 the activity in question doesn't attract service....