2023 (8) TMI 169

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ction Case No. 10338 of 2023 - -<br>GST<br>HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE K. VINOD CHANDRAN And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY For the Petitioners : Mr. Manish Jha, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Vikash Kumar, SC-11 JUDGMENT ( Per : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ) The petitioner is aggrieved with the fact that the mistake committed by the Executive Engineer, Road Division has resu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....as dismissed. In fact, the specific contention of the appellant-petitioner that deductions of another concern have been made and shown in the account of the petitioner, was specifically rejected by the Tribunal. The Tribunal also noticed that there was absolutely no evidence produced to substantiate the contention. 5. The learned Government Advocate brings our notice to Section 39 of the GST Act,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f balance amount of tax in terms of Section 112 (8) and (9) of the B.G.S.T Act upon deposit of the amounts as contemplated under Sub-section (8) of Section 112. 9. The respondent State authorities have acknowledged the fact of non-constitution of the Tribunal and come out with a notification bearing Order No. 09/2019-State Tax, S. O. 399, dated 11.12.2019 for removal of difficulties, in exercise ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....T. Act. The petitioner cannot be deprived of the benefit, due to non- constitution of the Tribunal by the respondents themselves. The recovery of balance amount, and any steps that may have been taken in this regard will thus be deemed to be stayed. It is not in dispute that similar relief has been granted by this Court in the case of SAJ Food Products Pvt. Ltd. vs. The State of Bihar & Others in....