2023 (8) TMI 154
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....filed against the order of Ld. NFAC, New Delhi dated 01.11.2022 for AY 2012-13. 2. The grounds of assessee are as follows:- 1. That the A.O. was not competent to rectify the order of Principal CIT, Ghaziabad who has issued Form No. 5 if any mistake pointed by the A.O., same can be rectified by the Pr. CIT, Ghaziabad. Therefore, CIT(A), is in error in dismiss the appeal. 2. That declaration fi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....-parte qua assessee. 4. From the grounds raised before ld. CIT(A) as well as before us the main contention of appellant is that the A.O. was not competent. to rectify the order of Principal CIT, Ghaziabad who has issued Form No. 5 if any mistake pointed by the A.O., same can be rectified by the Pr. CIT, Ghaziabad. Therefore, CIT(A), is in error in dismiss the appeal. It is also been contended by ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e case under reference there is apparent error with regard to rate at which tax is chargeable. 6. On careful consideration of above submission first of all, we find it appropriate to take note of some undisputed facts of the matter. We note that as per letters 13.06.2023 of ITO, Ward-1(1)(3) Meerut and written submissions of ld. Senior DR in this case form no. 5 under VSVS scheme was issued by th....


TaxTMI
TaxTMI