2023 (7) TMI 1139
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s and submissions of the case, the ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in confirming the action of the Assessing Officer in assuming jurisdiction u/S 153A and framing the impugned assessment order u/s 153A/143(3) , more so when it was barred by limitation." 3. The captioned appeals are disposed of on the basis of aforementioned grounds argued before us. 4. The underlying facts in this ground are that a search and seizure operation was conducted on 28.07.2011 on Shri Bhushan Lal Sawhney and others Group of cases on 28.07.2011 and warrant of authorization u/s 132 of the Act included the names Shri Praveen Sawhney and Smt. Sangeeta Sawhney, the captioned appellants. 5. Statutory notices were issued and served upon the assessee and after thorough scrutiny, assessment was framed u/s 153A r.w.s 143(3) of the Act vide order dated 04.03.2015. Challenge before us is that the assessment order so farmed is barred by limitation, as the same ought to have been framed on or before 31.03.2014. 6. The ld. DR vehemently stated that the reason for passing assessment order on 04.03.2015 is that a reference u/s 90 of the Act was made to Swiss authority and no information till the time....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ard of Direct Taxes. 2. A request for administrative assistance has been made to the Switzerland Tax Authorities on the 11 June, 2013 by the Joint Secretary, FT & TR - I, the competent authority of India, under the provisions of 'Exchange of Information' Article of Indo-Switzerland Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement. 3. Efforts are being made for the timely response to your request for administrative assistance and the information will be made available to you as soon as the Exchange of Information Cell receives any response from Competent Authority office. 4. This information is requested under 'Exchange of Information' Article of Indo-Switzerland Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement and its use and disclosure is strictly governed by it. Yours faithfully, Sd/- P.S.SIVASANKARAN US (FT&TR-III) (2)" 10. On the strength of these two letters, the revenue is contending that since a reference has been made to the Swiss Tax Authority, one year extended time became available to the Revenue for passing the assessment order in terms of Explanation IX to Section 153B of the Act and, therefore, the Assessing Offi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... obtained under the domestic laws of that State and shall be disclosed only to persons or authorities (including courts and administrative bodies) concerned with the assessment or collection of the enforcement or prosecution in respect of, or the determination of appeals in relation to the taxes referred to in paragraph 1, or the oversight of the above. Such persons or authorities shall use the information only for such purposes. They may disclose the information in public court proceedings or in judicial decisions. Notwithstanding the foregoing, information received by a Contracting State may be used for other purposes when such information may be used for such other purposes under the laws of both States and the competent authority of the supplying State authorizes such use. 3. In no case shall the provisions of paragraphs 1 and 2 be construed so as to impose on a Contracting State the obligation: (a) to carry out administrative measures at variance with the laws and administrative practice of that or of the other Contracting State; (b) to supply information which is not obtainable under the laws or in the normal course of the administration of that or ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... of this Article be construed as imposing upon either of the Contracting States the obligation to carry out administrative measures at variance with the regulations and practice of either Contracting State or which would be contrary to its sovereignty, security or Public policy or to supply particulars which are not procurable under its own legislation or that of the State making application." 13. A perusal of the aforementioned relevant clauses of the DTAA shows that the same is effective from 01.04.2011. This is further clarified form the following notification: "NOTIFICATION NO. S.O. 2903(E) [NO. 62/2011 (F. NO. - SECTION 90 OF THE OME- TAX ACT, 1961 - DOUBLE TAXATION AGREEMENT - AMENDMENT OF AGREEMENT FOR AVOIDANCE OF DOUBLE TAXATION AND PREVENTION OF FISCAL EVASION WITH FOREIGN COUNTRIES - SWISS CONFEDERATION SECTION 90 OF THE INCOME*TAX ACT, 1961 - DOUBLE TAXATION AGREEMENT - AMENDMENT OF AGREEMENT FOR AVOIDANCE OF DOUBLE TAXATION AND PREVENTION OF FISCAL EVASION WITH FOREIGN COUNTRIES* SWISS CONFEDERATION NOTIFICATION NO. S.O. 2903(E) [NO. 62/2011 (F. NO. 501/01/1973- FTD-I)], DATED 27-12-2011 Whereas a Protocol amending the Agreement b....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ement shall be deleted and replaced by the following Article: Article 26 Exchange of information 1. The competent authorities of the Contracting States shall exchange such information as is foreseeably relevant for carrying out the provisions of this Agreement or to the administration or enforcement of the domestic laws concerning taxes covered by the Agreement insofar as the taxation there under is not contrary to the Agreement. The exchange of information is not restricted by Article 1. 2. Any information received under paragraph 1 by a Contracting State shall be treated as secret in the same manner as information obtained under the domestic laws of that State and shall be disclosed only to persons or authorities (including courts and administrative bodies) concerned with the assessment or collection of, the enforcement or prosecution in respect of, or the determination of appeals in relation to the taxes referred to in paragraph I, or the oversight of the above. Such persons or authorities shall use the information only for such purposes. They may disclose the information in public court proceedings or in judicial decisions. Notwithstanding th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... is read with the reference made by the department, we find that the specific periods for which the reference has been made calling for information is 01.04.1995 to 31.03.2012. Therefore, qua the notification, information called by the Revenue by issuing the said reference was invalid for the period prior to 01.04.2011. 15. A reference to the decisions for analogous provisions can throw some light on this issue. The Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan was considering the reference for Special Audit u/s 142(2A) of the Act in the case of Bajrang Textiles 294 ITR 561and held as under: "Direction of the AO for special audit of assessee's accounts under s. 142(2A) one day before the expiry of limitation for completing the block assessment being merely to get extension of time and AO having asked the special auditor to prepare the books of account in the form of cash book and ledger on the basis of seized documents/papers and also trading and P&L a/c which is apparently beyond the scope of the provisions of s. 142(2A), the direction for special audit was illegal and consequently, the assessment was barred by time" 16. Similarly, the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....er u/s 142(2A) of the Act for A.Y 2009-10 without realizing that he is dealing with A.Y 2008-09. 16. The contention of the ld. DR that the letter to the appellant referred to both the A.Ys i.e. 2008-09 and 2009-10 and, therefore, there is no error in the same. We do not find any force in this contention of the ld. DR. As mentioned elsewhere, since each A.Y is considered as a separate unit the Assessing Officer should have made out a case for A.Y 2008-09 only and since the order framed u/s 142(2) of the Act also refers to A.Y 2009-10, then the same cannot be used for A.Y 2008-09. 17. The quarrel before us is as to whether the assessment order framed u/s 143(3) is passed within the period of limitation period prescribed under the Act or not. In our considered opinion, for coming to such a conclusion, we can examine whether the order passed u/s 142(2A) of the Act is in accordance with law or not. It is true that the order passed u/s 142(2A) of the Act is not appealable but when an assessment order is challenged, then the different aspects, which are integral to the process and ultimate completion of the amount can be challenged in appeal and since the ground before u....
TaxTMI